Cocrystals
offer pharmaceutical manufacturers an alternative method to using salts or
hydrates for obtaining a crystalline solid form of an API with desirable
stability and dissolution behavior.
Recently,
the FDA issues its final regulatory guidance on cocrystals (http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM281764.pdf).
Even though
nearly all commenters requested that the FDA not classify cocrystals as 'drug product intermediates' but as salts, the
agency elected to keep this definition in the final guidance.
Why were so many opposed to this
approach, and what impact might the FDA’s decision to retain this classification
have on the eventual acceptance of cocrystals in drug formulations?
There is
significantly more information required for drug product intermediates, In
addition, the decision could benefit generic companies, which may be able to
use cocrystals as a means to get around patents. Thus, in the short and long
term, this decision may deter branded pharmaceutical manufacturers from
developing formulations based on cocrystals.
What do you
think of the FDA’s final guidance on cocrystals? Will it have an impact on
their further development? Or do you
think the performance benefits that can be gained in certain cases by
using cocrystals will outweigh the additional testing and reporting
requirements and the potential longer-term threat of generic competition?
If you
haven’t signed up to receive it yet, take the opportunity right now. Just click
here. Also check out the Pharmaceutical Technology/Biopharm International
Marketplace at www.pharmabiomarketplace.com.
Cynthia Challener, PhD
Editor
The Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Manufacturing & Marketplace Report
No comments:
Post a Comment